Product: EOS Digital Rebel T2i
Manufacturer: Canon
MSRP: $900
Lowest Historical Price: $810 History

Move over T1i, the Canon EOS Rebel T2i is here to take the mantle as Canon's newest flagship entry-level DSLR. The T2i boasts an 18 megapixel sensor, 1.04 million pixel 3:2 LCD screen, as well as a 63-zone metering sensor and improved movie functionality -- features borrowed from its big brother, the Canon 7D. Add to the mix some full-featured HD video recording, and I knew I had to take the plunge and check it out.

Canon seems to have pulled out all the stops for this model and stuffed it with features that put it very close to the next model up, the Canon 7D. With a similar 18 megapixel sensor, 63-zone iFCL metering and full HD video mode with manual exposure control and selectable frame rates, those considering their first DSLR or a second one for shooting video would be hard-pressed to not give this camera some serious consideration. Rounding out the rest of the features is a 3.0” 3:2 1.04 million pixel LCD screen, 3.7fps continuous shooting, 100-6400 ISO, and an external microphone socket.

At first glance, the T2i looks and feels like any other DSLR from Canon's Digital Rebel line: compact, lightweight, and plasticky. The build quality is nothing to write home about. The camera body with kit lens is small and lightweight-feeling, and the handgrip is deep and more than adequate. These qualities, together with Live View, make shooting one-handed easy and secure. Since the buttons are fairly small, it's easy to accidentally press the wrong one. Still, the T2i is a far cry from the early days of bare bones entry-level DSLRs, which Canon pioneered.

The menu system for the T2i is straightforward, easy to read, and very intuitive. The camera inherited the ”quick control” button from the 7D, which allows you to change various shooting settings onscreen, eliminating the desire or need for many external one-use buttons.

Continuous shooting speed is a decent 3.7fps, an improvement over the T1i at 3.4fps and adequate for anyone who's looking at a camera in this price range. Autofocus is speedy and locks on quickly. However, using autofocus in conjunction with Live View slows AF quite a bit, although it's still very accurate.

Image quality is excellent with low noise across the entire ISO range. Some images are not the sharpest when viewed at 100%, but that's likely the fault of the kit lens and not the camera itself. Upgrading to higher quality optics is a must if you want to bring out the most in this camera. Compared to the sub-300k pixel LCDs of past digital cameras, the one on the T2i is amazing to look at. It features an anti-glare and anti-smudge coating and over a million pixels in a 3:2 format, so you don't have to deal with black bars when viewing pictures you've taken.

One of the T2i's headlining features is the greatly expanded movie mode for a camera in this price range. It can record 1080p video at 30, 25 or 24 frames per second or 720P at 60 or 50 frames per second. Throw in the ability to manually adjust exposure and use an external microphone, and you have the perfect camera for any budding filmmaker.

The number of improvements and features added to the T2i are impressive, but they come at a price. At the time of this review, the T2i runs for about 850 USD with kit lens. For a camera in this price range, the build quality and general feel are somewhat lacking. Many cheaper alternatives with slightly lesser specs, such as the T1i or the Nikon D5000, are available for the budget-minded first-time buyer. I would still recommend this camera to those looking for a worthy upgrade or anyone in the market for a backup DSLR.

Image Gallery

Sample Pictures

  • Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
    lawnsprinkler Ben's cred: 191
    Posted 6:48 am PDT 06/4/10

    hey peanuthead, I actually do own the T2i so you need to apologize to me for making things up.

  • Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
    anonymous8 Ben's cred: 4
    Posted 10:29 am PDT 06/4/10

    **Equipment making a 'difference' (and I agree they do, technically) has nothing to do with making great photos.**

    You are just contradicting yourself. You should just claim "I take good photographs using photoshop instead of your D5000". I think you are just an ignorant man ignoring the reality and the fact that better equipments DO take better pictures in term of depth of view, noise level, color and contrasts, etc. It is the framing and the creativity + your so claimed "photoshop that did not travel to NYC or Colorado" that make a picture look amazing.

    My point is simple. You are claiming your editing as a tool to great photography. If you have the right equipments that can give you natural lights, color, and contrasts, who need editing software? If you are stressing on your skills so much, why do you need editing tools? If you are so great, why don't you just post your landscape pics out of your point and shoot without editing? I would love to see it, really!

    Again, you are just being ignorant debating your narrow minded opinion with millions of pro photographers out there, lol. Call it a day man....if I give you a Nikon D3s, I bet you will become a

    Oh Damn, I just clicked on the link. You have THAT much time to search and post all those link? Now I know why you can't afford a non-refurbised camera, lol. Peace!

  • Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
    peanut_man Ben's cred: 17
    Posted 5:52 pm PDT 06/11/10

    LOL, Ben you know it's your site. Always entertaining.

    Landscape w/o edit, sure, these only pass thru PS to convert from RAW to JPG and some cropping:
    (actually this one is straight JPG from camera, didn't even took it in RAW)

    Oh and this one is my favorite of NYC bridge:
    That is very much straight from the camera. I only did cropping on it. The neat cloud and water 'dreamy' effect is from an extra long exposure, and a chinese-made cheap 8x ND filter I was using.

    There's a bunch more, enjoy your searching.

    BTW, I never claim editing tool make good photos, it's only anonymous8 that's claiming so. I'm claiming my crappy D5000 makes wonderful photos and that no one needs expensive equipment to make great shots. People if you can afford them, great. But going around trashing other people's work because they use a cheaper camera is just ignorant and shows they don't really know what makes a great picture great. (which, again, has nothing to do w/ equipment or software... haha, flame on.)

    I never claim my skill either, read my posts please. Never once that I claim I'm a good photographer. Because I know I'm not. However, if my sucky photos from crappy camera stir such defensive emotional response from someone who spend so much more on photo equipments, I'll take that as a compliment. Thanks guys.

    Grow up kids, now go make Ben some $ and buy stuff from his link.

  • Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
    Posted 11:52 am PDT 06/14/10

    Please Make All General Photography/Editing Discussions And Arguments A New Topic In The Off-Topic Forum:


  • Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
    boozemunkey Ben's cred: 8
    Posted 6:52 pm PDT 06/22/10

    I love this camera, ever since we got it into the store I haven't been able to stop fiddling with it. I like the HD movie capabilities of the camera, it's pretty decent for an SLR camera.

Already a member? Sign in below.

Forgot Password?
Sign in with Facebook

Registration takes seconds! Once registered you�ll have members only access to:

  • Deal Alert email notifications
  • Giveaways for the hottest products
  • Newsletter for events and holiday promotions
  • Deal comments and discussions
  • The best deal community, ever
X Close

The best deals, product reviews, and giveaway announcements emailed directly to you!

Sign up now for the Ben's Bargains newsletter!

Email address is not valid

X Close

Thanks! You can also register an account with us to be eligible for Giveaway Entries, Deal Alerts, and Comments.