Wirefly.com has the T-Mobile Sidekick Slide (Black) for Free with free shipping. Price requires activation of a qualifying T-Mobile account. Features a full QWERTY keyboard, 1.3MP camera, Quad-Band GSM, 128MB built-in memory, and bluetooth.
| 6ave.com General Electric 5.8GHZ Dual Handset Cordless $25  Discuss (0) |
WireFly Motorola Droid Android Smartphone $150  Discuss (18) |
Newegg MOTOROLA SLVR L7 Black Unlocked Cell Phone $60  Discuss (3) |
Dell Business HTC S743 Unlocked GSM Smartphone $357  Discuss (4) |
#1
ironbadge - Posted 8:09 am PDT 06/19/09 (986 Posts)
Hey I find it is not true when the phone companies or their affiliates advertise that the customers can get the phones for free. We have to pay one hell of a cost cumulatively. There is no such free things ever.
#2
MaJoad52 - Posted 8:46 am PDT 06/19/09 (459 Posts)
Very insightful, #1.
#3
papeluv - Posted 9:17 am PDT 06/19/09 (426 Posts)
I wouldnt take this ghetto ass piece of shit for free, i would not take it at all.
#4
jujube - Posted 2:32 pm PDT 06/19/09 (78 Posts)
I wouldn't buy anything sold by or through wirefly especially since they are run by the same guy that nearly destroyed apple
#5
jujube - Posted 2:39 pm PDT 06/19/09 (78 Posts)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InPhonic
InPhonic maintained an unsatifactory rating with the Better Business Bureau serving Washington DC and Eastern Pennsylvania. Over the last 36 months the BBB has processed 126 unresolved consumer complaints regarding selling practices, advertising issues, service issues among other areas of concern.[6]
In April 2007, the FCC settled rebate related charges against InPhonic. The Commission alleged that InPhonic, in connection with its advertised rebate offers, failed to provide promised documents needed to obtain rebates, to send out rebate checks, and to adequately disclose material terms and conditions prior to consumers purchases. The FTC further alleged that InPhonic misled some consumers about the number of wireless bills that had to be submitted with their rebate application and misrepresented that consumers would have a reasonable opportunity to resubmit rebate applications that were deemed incomplete. InPhonic was ordered to pay consumers who applied for a rebate with the company but were denied a check based on the company’s deceptive and unfair practices.[7]
InPhonic earlier settled similar charges leveled by the District of Columbia attorney general.
A large number of InPhonic's customers complained about the non-fulfillment of rebates that were promised to customers. Many of these customers were listed as nonsecured creditors in the company's Chapter 11 filing in 2007.
InPhonic maintained an unsatifactory rating with the Better Business Bureau serving Washington DC and Eastern Pennsylvania. Over the last 36 months the BBB has processed 126 unresolved consumer complaints regarding selling practices, advertising issues, service issues among other areas of concern.[6]
In April 2007, the FCC settled rebate related charges against InPhonic. The Commission alleged that InPhonic, in connection with its advertised rebate offers, failed to provide promised documents needed to obtain rebates, to send out rebate checks, and to adequately disclose material terms and conditions prior to consumers purchases. The FTC further alleged that InPhonic misled some consumers about the number of wireless bills that had to be submitted with their rebate application and misrepresented that consumers would have a reasonable opportunity to resubmit rebate applications that were deemed incomplete. InPhonic was ordered to pay consumers who applied for a rebate with the company but were denied a check based on the company’s deceptive and unfair practices.[7]
InPhonic earlier settled similar charges leveled by the District of Columbia attorney general.
A large number of InPhonic's customers complained about the non-fulfillment of rebates that were promised to customers. Many of these customers were listed as nonsecured creditors in the company's Chapter 11 filing in 2007.
Wii
Elite360
New iPod