| Newegg ASUS M4A785TD-M ATX AMD Motherboard $70 ![]() Discuss (1) |
Newegg AMD Athlon II X2 2.9GHz Socket AM3 + Motherboard $123 ![]() Discuss (1) |
Newegg MSI X58M Micro ATX Intel Motherboard $140 ![]() Discuss (1) |
Newegg MSI P45 Platinum LGA 775 ATX Intel Motherboard $50 ![]() Discuss (1) |
#1
cavedog - Posted 7:42 am PDT 09/16/09 (62 Posts)
I just saw a review posted at Anandtech about the new Athlon X4 920. It's a $99 chip and is more or less just as good as this Q8200 quad core.
If you are starting from scratch and you are leaning towards intel, go with the i5/i7 chips.
If it is cheap budget system you want, go with AMD Athlon X4 920.
Avoid this C2Quad Q8200.
If you are starting from scratch and you are leaning towards intel, go with the i5/i7 chips.
If it is cheap budget system you want, go with AMD Athlon X4 920.
Avoid this C2Quad Q8200.
#2
shogo_tnt - Posted 8:32 am PDT 09/16/09 (82 Posts)
$99 for E8200 if you have a Micro Center near you.
http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0312980
http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0312980
#3
21st_Hermit - Posted 9:12 am PDT 09/16/09 (292 Posts)
#1
Read the xbitlabs review and compare the power consumption of the Q8200 to the 620, you might change your mind. Besides, Intel will react fast and have a $99 Quad in a few weeks.
Read the xbitlabs review and compare the power consumption of the Q8200 to the 620, you might change your mind. Besides, Intel will react fast and have a $99 Quad in a few weeks.
#4
radix33 - Posted 9:37 am PDT 09/16/09 (201 Posts)
Uh, the Microcenter deal is a Core DUO E8200. This is a Quad.
#5
shogo_tnt - Posted 9:48 am PDT 09/16/09 (82 Posts)
#4, you are correct, I updated my post.
The E8200 (2 Cores) has 6MB Cache and operates at 2.66GHz.
The Q8200 (4 Cores) has 4MB Cache and operates at 2.33GHz.
Unless running an application that uses more than 2 cores, I doubt the smaller cache and slower frequency will help.
The E8200 (2 Cores) has 6MB Cache and operates at 2.66GHz.
The Q8200 (4 Cores) has 4MB Cache and operates at 2.33GHz.
Unless running an application that uses more than 2 cores, I doubt the smaller cache and slower frequency will help.
#6
Necro Joe - Posted 11:03 am PDT 09/16/09 (882 Posts)
Depends on what you use it for, I'd rather have more cores that higher mhz. I multitask lots, so I went quad core.
Also, #1, going up to i7 usually means a new chip socket and expensive motherboard architecture, so not only does the chip cost more, but so will the motherboard.
That said, I went with an i7 on my current build because I will then have more headroom for upgrading in the future.
Also, #1, going up to i7 usually means a new chip socket and expensive motherboard architecture, so not only does the chip cost more, but so will the motherboard.
That said, I went with an i7 on my current build because I will then have more headroom for upgrading in the future.
#7
ChugokuOtaku - Posted 6:42 pm PDT 09/16/09 (1438 Posts)
at this point, anyone building a new system from scratch should look elsewhere. Only those with an existing LGA775 setup should be considering these
#8
joebowls - Posted 10:57 pm PDT 09/16/09 (24 Posts)
Good information. Thanks guys.







Wii
iPod