Ben's Bargains

Nikon D60 Digital SLR with 18-55mm Lens

Deal:

Nikon D60 Digital SLR with 18-55mm Lens $529 at Dell
 
Discuss (15) : History : Tell : Posted 1:42 PM PDT 10/29/08 by Ben
Nikon D60 Digital SLR with 18-55mm LensDell Home has the Nikon D60 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera with 18-55mm Lens for $599 - $70 code WCDRN$4S2PGLFK [Exp 11/13] = $529 with free shipping.

  • 2.5-inch color LCD monitor with 3 colorful display options
  • AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR Lens, Uses SD/SDHC Media
  • ISO 100-1600 in steps of 1 EV, Autofocus with built-in SWM and manual focus
  • 20% off laptops & desktops on landing page coupon code 5TK?LC9VJ5F$33 [Exp 12/11]
  • 25% off laptops & desktops on landing page coupon code ?$QNC1?HSKNR9F [Exp 12/11]
  • Free 2nd Business Day Shipping on $99 E&A orders coupon code ZBC8LPSBMMRB28 [Exp 12/31]
  • Circuit City
    Nikon D3000 10.2 MP 3.0" LCD Digital SLR $470

    Discuss (1)
    Newegg
    Canon PowerShot S90 10.0 MP Digital Camera $402

    Discuss (6)
    Beach Camera
    Canon Powershot SD1200 IS 10MP Digital Camera $169

    Discuss (0)
    Newegg
    Canon PowerShot SX20 12.1 MP Camera $349

    Discuss (0)
    #1   kliving - Posted 2:02 pm PDT 10/29/08 (143 Posts)
    Dang! which one do I choose... Evolt 520, D60, or XSi? Evolt and D60 have gotten really cheap.
    #2   BensBargains - Posted 2:21 pm PDT 10/29/08 (1143 Posts)
    I am saving up for the Canon XSI
    #3   ralphk917 - Posted 2:38 pm PDT 10/29/08 (789 Posts)
    I would suggest the D40 - it's 6MP, but same sized chip, so the photowells are larger, which generally means less noise. Very sharp. If you tend not to go crop-crazy, you won't miss the 4MP.

    If you have to have 10MP, I would get the D200. (I have the D80 & D200; in-law has the D40).

    As for Nikon/Canon, I went Nikon b/c Nikon's LCDs are MUCH better, and the cropped sensor means smaller, cheaper glass (although your wide wide angle suffers -- a 10mm focal length lens becomes 15mm). Canon makes great cameras, but with the full frame chip you need the expensive pro glass to get decent shots.

    YMMV, though, and I was getting into digital from scratch (my older pro Canon film glass would not fit new Canon bodies - this I found offensive, but not controlling).

    See dpreview.com for a month's worth of reading...
    #4   TheBS - Posted 4:04 pm PDT 10/29/08 (1229 Posts)
    [ Part 1/2 ]

    Hey #1, don't forget Pentax and Sony options as well.

    Pentax's K is staying APS-C (1.5x crop) and Olympus' E-volt is staying 4/3rds (2x crop), both offering reduced size lenses. I find APS-C is the "best balance," and have a thing for Pentax's system/lenses, but E-volt is quite enticing in the sizes and options for the price too. Pentax now offers the K2000 (K-m outside the US) with a two (2) lens system and AF200 flash attachment as standard, and it should come down another $100 during Christmas shopping season. There's also the K200D, which is basically the K10D (with key differences).

    Canon, Nikon and now Sony are offering more full-frame, and lenses that cover it. But their entry-to-mid level mainstays are definitely APS-C (1.5x crop) for now.

    I agree with #3, if you're going Nikon, get the sub-$600 D80 or D200 (not sure where it's at new nowdays), instead of the D60. If you can find the D40 (not the D40x, which is little different than D60) for dirt-cheap (sub-$300), its 6MP output is excellent.

    If you're going Canon, the Rebel XSi should be your first stop. Kinda hard to argue for anything higher or lower at its price-point.

    BTW, and I cannot stress this enough, don't go dSLR only to buy a single, $500+ "superzoom" lens. Get at least a two (2) lens system of wide + tele. You'll thank me in the end. A lot of the "kits" are 18-55 (~28-80mm equiv), but I'd opt for something that starts at 16 (~24mm equiv) on the wide to "make dSLR worth your while."
    #5   TheBS - Posted 4:06 pm PDT 10/29/08 (1229 Posts)
    [ Part 2/2 ]

    I have now inspected every "kit" lens and a lot of sites agree, the metal mount and build quality of the Pentax DA 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 "kit" is really hard to beat against other DA 18-5x f/3.5-5.6 options, and the optics are pretty damn good in its class. That's why I really favor the K2000 system with flash included (at least as it drops towards $500 this holiday season).

    But in reality, you typically don't want to stick with the "kit," and every system has a solid, $200-300 wide angle or 3rd party option. In the Pentax world, I recommend people skip directly to the ~$250 DA 16-45 f/4. I personally have the more expensive (over $500) DA* 16-50 f/2.8, which is also sold as the Tokina 16-50 f/2.8 AT-X Pro for other systems. People will have their recommendations for other systems as well.
    #6   jughead - Posted 6:29 pm PDT 10/29/08 (351 Posts)
    If you're gonna get a Nikon, there is no reason to spend the extra money on the D60. Get the D40 instead and spend the money you save on better lenses. The D40, D40x, and D60 do not have internal focusing motors, limiting the number and type of lenses you can use with autofocus.

    Or, as others have suggested, don't get a Nikon.
    #7   Crispy - Posted 10:58 pm PDT 10/29/08 (201 Posts)
    Cheapest price I've seen this go so far. D60 is the refresh of the D40x - but like others suggest, if you're new to DSLR, you might want to consider the D40 and save yourself at least $100. If anything you get a VR lens and D-lighting with this camera over the D40/x kits.
    #8   icmac2 - Posted 3:46 am PDT 10/30/08 (120 Posts)
    Thanks for all of the advises, I'll go for the D40 instead, now, an someone show me where can I get the D40 for sub $300?
    I'll get you say $25 bonus?
    #9   sabih786 - Posted 6:50 am PDT 10/30/08 (30 Posts)
    I agree, dont go with the d40/d60, its just too slow to use, and you will end up with an abundance of unfocused shots.
    #10   dealster85 - Posted 7:08 am PDT 10/30/08 (73 Posts)
    How would compare the speed of the d-90??
    #11   MoonAndStar - Posted 7:14 am PDT 10/30/08 (17 Posts)
    Canon XS and Nikon D40 is the best value unless you are in sports photos.
    #12   TheBS - Posted 1:10 pm PDT 10/30/08 (1229 Posts)
    MoonAndStar wrote:
    Canon XS and Nikon D40 is the best value unless you are in sports photos.
    I have to disagree. The XSi and D80 hardly cost any more when talking Canon-Nikon.
    #13   Pei - Posted 8:41 pm PDT 10/30/08 (366 Posts)
    Any two lens suggestion for Nikon? I am using a Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR kit and would like to have a telephoto to extend the range.
    #14   dsoakland - Posted 11:59 pm PDT 10/31/08 (75 Posts)
    I got D60 with kit lens and 55-200mm from ritzcamera.com for a pretty good deal.
    #15   dragilores - Posted 11:03 am PDT 11/1/08 (39 Posts)
    D60 deal is pretty good for the specs, but quality of shots is not as good as D40. The pixel count and faster fps is the only useful thing, but it depends what you are shooting.

    D90 is actually better if you want to step away from D40. It has auto-focus with all AF lenses, unlike D40, D40x and D60 that only auto-focus with the AF-S lenses. D90 has Gen-2 chip that processes image better.

    So either go with D40 or D90. I am a Nikon guy, so I don't know about Pentax or Canon. All I can say is, Nikon is good enough to make me stay with it. The grip is ergonomics. It also has a full array of lenses.

    Pei, if you have D60, you might want to try the 70-300 AF-S. If you have other bodies, you can try the older lenses AF 28-200mm. Nikon has a few of those. Or the older AF 70-300mm G.

    Check eBay for an array of deals for old but good and cheap lenses.
     
    Post your comments : To post comments, please Sign In or Register
    To post comments, please Sign In or Register.       Forgot Password?


    Black Friday

    Black Friday
     

    Tracker

     

    Advertisement

    Radio Shack
     

    Recent Coupons

     

    Featured Coupons

     

    Featured Merchant