| Buy.com Koss PortaPro Portable Headphone $33 ![]() Discuss (10) |
Newegg Mall Panasonic RP-HTX7 Retro Style Headphones $30 ![]() Discuss (2) |
Amazon Ultimate Ears-Metro.fi 100v Noise Isolating Earphones $36 ![]() Discuss (2) |
Amazon JBuds J2 Premium Hi-FI Noise Isolating Earbuds $14 ![]() Discuss (0) |
#1
mdheinzer - Posted 2:15 pm PST 11/8/08 (576 Posts)
are these really better than say skullcandy for $20? i mean 105 for earbuds? they would have to be unbelievable.
#2
kkndkknd2 - Posted 2:29 pm PST 11/8/08 (28 Posts)
good deal.. thx
#3
EchoTony - Posted 2:31 pm PST 11/8/08 (343 Posts)
Is isolation superior to noise canceling over the ear type?
#4
NeuB - Posted 2:37 pm PST 11/8/08 (113 Posts)
No WAY could these be worth $150 before the discount, what could they possibly do? How much of an audiophile could you possibly be. It seems ridiculous to buy these, the same goes for the $1000+ over the ear things.
#5
wrong0 - Posted 3:22 pm PST 11/8/08 (210 Posts)
Unless you don't mind paying a price premium (mostly all for the brand name), I would rather suggest Sennheiser CX300's. I tried Shure E2C's a few years back, and they sound similar if not exactly the same.
Basically, the point is, when you're using earbuds -- you're probably going to be using a portable media/mp3 player/laptop/phone, which all have audio output sound quality nowhere near that of a recording studio (or even a good home audio setup), where quality monitoring headphones are essential.
$40 at Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-CX300-B-Earbuds-Black/dp/B000E6G9RI
Basically, the point is, when you're using earbuds -- you're probably going to be using a portable media/mp3 player/laptop/phone, which all have audio output sound quality nowhere near that of a recording studio (or even a good home audio setup), where quality monitoring headphones are essential.
$40 at Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-CX300-B-Earbuds-Black/dp/B000E6G9RI
#6
binaryvisions - Posted 3:46 pm PST 11/8/08 (915 Posts)
These are absolutely excellent earbuds. You do not have to have recording studio quality to appreciate them.
I listened to half a dozen different sets of buds and these blew them all away - at this price point, I don't think you can do any better. There are better buds at higher prices, but these are a good mid range.
I listened to half a dozen different sets of buds and these blew them all away - at this price point, I don't think you can do any better. There are better buds at higher prices, but these are a good mid range.
#7
poorstudent - Posted 4:03 pm PST 11/8/08 (82 Posts)
unless you listen to music that are very high quality, I would advise you to just buy cheaper ear buds, like sony or JVC.
A 50-60 price can get you a pretty decent one.
#8
noneyet99 - Posted 4:08 pm PST 11/8/08 (157 Posts)
as for isolation vs. noice cancelling:
I've used both good noise canceling (the BOSE that everyone drools over, plus good Sennheiser sound isolating, and to me they both give you about the same "reduction" (as measured by plane trips with them).
The difference is, the isolating just isolates. The canceling leaves you with and annoying high-frequency hum or buzz, even the really expensive ones. And I'm 40, not 8 yrs old, so my ears aren't THAT pristine.
I'd go with the in-ear isolating over any of the current cancellation types. Even the $40 Sennheiser trump the $350? BOSE (not sure of current prices).
I've used both good noise canceling (the BOSE that everyone drools over, plus good Sennheiser sound isolating, and to me they both give you about the same "reduction" (as measured by plane trips with them).
The difference is, the isolating just isolates. The canceling leaves you with and annoying high-frequency hum or buzz, even the really expensive ones. And I'm 40, not 8 yrs old, so my ears aren't THAT pristine.
I'd go with the in-ear isolating over any of the current cancellation types. Even the $40 Sennheiser trump the $350? BOSE (not sure of current prices).
#9
Necromas - Posted 5:08 pm PST 11/8/08 (208 Posts)
... mid range?
I agree with everything else you said, but mid range? I think your standards are a little off from the norm.
I agree with everything else you said, but mid range? I think your standards are a little off from the norm.
#10
TTM77 - Posted 5:42 pm PST 11/8/08 (984 Posts)
I have the $2,000 one. It works great. I put it on and it not just isolate the wife's voice, she was gone. It even bring me beer. LOL
The $10 work just as good.
The $10 work just as good.
#11
fubaconat55 - Posted 7:51 pm PST 11/8/08 (248 Posts)
I would not pay over 50 for earbuds. this is silly.
#12
kidrobobot - Posted 8:03 pm PST 11/8/08 (50 Posts)
I tried this once. It was just slightly better than the 110. Not really worth its price to me.
#13
thrashertm - Posted 8:07 pm PST 11/8/08 (14 Posts)
I have both the Sennheiser CX300 and the Shure E2C. I prefer the Cx300 - much richer base, and I got them for $10 from Newegg
#14
vonZipper - Posted 8:14 pm PST 11/8/08 (108 Posts)
+1 for the Senn 300s
Most of the time, I end up ripping them out of my hears when I snag the cord on something. I can tolerate a $30 set loss in that manner, but will break my heart if a $150 set got toasted like that.
Most of the time, I end up ripping them out of my hears when I snag the cord on something. I can tolerate a $30 set loss in that manner, but will break my heart if a $150 set got toasted like that.
#15
bunnie - Posted 8:15 pm PST 11/8/08 (264 Posts)
I paid over a $100 for Shure earbuds. They were more annoying to wear than the Sennheiser CX300 that have gone from $80 to $50 to $30 and now I see to $10.
Shure is the word "overpriced" translated into a manufacturer's name.
Shure is the word "overpriced" translated into a manufacturer's name.
#16
Pdok - Posted 8:29 pm PST 11/8/08 (525 Posts)
The problem with these types of "earbuds" is that they're trying to do the job of much more expensive in-ear monitors, and they generally don't do it well.
I've used the cheaper Shures, and the slightly more expensive Westone (who used to make the Shures.) The $75 Westones are made much better than these. I've RMA'd my Shures twice for one of the earpieces dying. The Westones are a little more durable.
The $450 Westones IEM's are fantastic for what they do, which is kill off the 3000-plus Watts of soundstage noise so you can hear the mix you want at an appropriate volume. They're maybe not the best choice for jogging around with your iPod...
I've used the cheaper Shures, and the slightly more expensive Westone (who used to make the Shures.) The $75 Westones are made much better than these. I've RMA'd my Shures twice for one of the earpieces dying. The Westones are a little more durable.
The $450 Westones IEM's are fantastic for what they do, which is kill off the 3000-plus Watts of soundstage noise so you can hear the mix you want at an appropriate volume. They're maybe not the best choice for jogging around with your iPod...
#17
craigkes - Posted 8:53 pm PST 11/8/08 (153 Posts)
Yeah, 105 is a lot of bones to some headphones. Plus, I am so tough on mine it really wouldn't be worth it I don't think.
#18
h0m3l3s5 - Posted 9:06 pm PST 11/8/08 (51 Posts)
#19
intense321 - Posted 9:19 pm PST 11/8/08 (188 Posts)
I've owned every earbud out there, including these. They are just "ok". I paid $250 for mine and they weren't worth that. They *might* be worth $105. I now use the Sennheiser IE8. Look 'em up. Can't get 'em cheaper than $450. Worth every penny.
#20
hoffi - Posted 1:26 am PST 11/9/08 (292 Posts)







Wii
iPod