NewEgg.com has the new Lenovo IdeaPad S10 10.2" Notebook with Intel ATOM Processor N270 Single Core ( 1.60GHz 533MHz 512KB ) for $350 + $0 shipping = $350 shipped.| Office Depot HP Pavilion G71-340US 17.3" Core 2 Duo Notebook $550 ![]() Discuss (0) |
Office Depot Toshiba 10.1" NB205-N210 Atom N280 Netbook $330 ![]() Discuss (0) |
Office Max Compaq Presario CQ5210F Desktop Computer $330 ![]() Discuss (0) |
Super Media Store New Offers and Promotions ![]() Discuss (0) |
#1
refractionsofthedawn - Posted 8:44 am PST 01/12/09 (16 Posts)
Sorry, I'm confused. Is is 1gb ram or 512mb ram? If it weren't for the comma before the number 512, I would think that was for the video processor. Clarification anyone?
#2
boxingfan - Posted 8:51 am PST 01/12/09 (453 Posts)
Clarification can be found here:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834146526&nm_mc=AFC-Bensbargains&cm_mmc=AFC-Bensbargains-_-NA
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834146526&nm_mc=AFC-Bensbargains&cm_mmc=AFC-Bensbargains-_-NA
#3
dhho1 - Posted 9:16 am PST 01/12/09 (1829 Posts)
#4
koticphreak - Posted 9:20 am PST 01/12/09 (73 Posts)
yes, this is more than enough to do everyday surfing/office duty
#5
sagirl17 - Posted 9:39 am PST 01/12/09 (34 Posts)
the description says 1GB RAM
#6
fxp - Posted 9:55 am PST 01/12/09 (435 Posts)
#7
the lawyer - Posted 10:16 am PST 01/12/09 (3749 Posts)
#8
koticphreak - Posted 11:03 am PST 01/12/09 (73 Posts)
no processor runs vista well
#9
boxingfan - Posted 11:31 am PST 01/12/09 (453 Posts)
Not sure what you are talking about #8. At this point, Vista is a much better operating system than XP. It just needs more ram.
#10
digh - Posted 11:53 am PST 01/12/09 (305 Posts)
I've been using PCs since IBM DOS w no hard drives, and Vista SUCKS!!! No matter how much ram you feed it. Long Live xp.
#11
koticphreak - Posted 11:55 am PST 01/12/09 (73 Posts)
#9, other than it being pretty, more fool proof, and having a few useful 'gadgets', what makes vista a much better operating system?
#12
boxingfan - Posted 12:04 pm PST 01/12/09 (453 Posts)
#11, Vista is more stable than XP. It just doesn't crash. It also doesn't suffer from Windows rot like XP. After a while, things just stop working in XP.
I've built over 200 machines. Several returning customers. The ones who have the most problems, you know, the ones who really shouldn't actually own a computer, have had a difficult time with XP. It would always seem to crash on them.
I've converted them over to Vista, and I never hear from them about problems. Their computers just work. No crashes.
I've built over 200 machines. Several returning customers. The ones who have the most problems, you know, the ones who really shouldn't actually own a computer, have had a difficult time with XP. It would always seem to crash on them.
I've converted them over to Vista, and I never hear from them about problems. Their computers just work. No crashes.
#13
baltimoron - Posted 12:14 pm PST 01/12/09 (319 Posts)
#14
david714 - Posted 1:05 pm PST 01/12/09 (441 Posts)
#15
koticphreak - Posted 1:45 pm PST 01/12/09 (73 Posts)
#12, all you basically said is that vista is more fool proof and yes, I agree. I keep my XP machines on for 2-3 months at a time without a restart with daily use on one of them and 2-3 times/week on the other. I can count the XP crashes i've had in the last 8 years on my 2 hands.
Vista has NO benefits whatsoever that are worth the switch for someone who knows how to use a computer.
If you think Vista is great, you may as well switch to Apple, it's more stable and prettier.
Vista has NO benefits whatsoever that are worth the switch for someone who knows how to use a computer.
If you think Vista is great, you may as well switch to Apple, it's more stable and prettier.
#16
boxingfan - Posted 1:59 pm PST 01/12/09 (453 Posts)
#15, Is that really all you got from my post? You should probably read it again. Maybe several times. The simple fact is it works better than XP. I have the customer base to prove it. Plus, it is more functional. Try getting QAM support from XP.
It's simple really. Vista isn't a huge leap ahead of Xp. XP wasn't a huge leap over 2000, or 98. But Vist is far superior than 98. Technology takes small steps most of the time. I wonder how many people were holding onto their horses when the auto came around.
You can keep xp for the next ten years. You will find yourself far behind if you do though.
It's simple really. Vista isn't a huge leap ahead of Xp. XP wasn't a huge leap over 2000, or 98. But Vist is far superior than 98. Technology takes small steps most of the time. I wonder how many people were holding onto their horses when the auto came around.
You can keep xp for the next ten years. You will find yourself far behind if you do though.
#17
koticphreak - Posted 2:27 pm PST 01/12/09 (73 Posts)
XP was not much superior to 2000, but 2000 was much more superior to 98, particularly, NTFS which is much faster and more stable.
Vista is less of a leap ahead as much as a leap sideways.
I read your post again, you said people who don't know how to use a computer crashed their computer more using XP than vista. As for "things stop working". what things? everything works for me.
And as I thought I made it clear before, I said people who know how to use a computer should keep XP, so they don't need QAM support.
I'm not against change. I installed vista for 2 days when it came out. found it to be slower and less efficient all around so I reverted. I'll probably switch to Windows 8 when it comes out in ~2012
Vista is less of a leap ahead as much as a leap sideways.
I read your post again, you said people who don't know how to use a computer crashed their computer more using XP than vista. As for "things stop working". what things? everything works for me.
And as I thought I made it clear before, I said people who know how to use a computer should keep XP, so they don't need QAM support.
I'm not against change. I installed vista for 2 days when it came out. found it to be slower and less efficient all around so I reverted. I'll probably switch to Windows 8 when it comes out in ~2012
#18
truebeliever71 - Posted 3:49 pm PST 01/12/09 (12 Posts)
Vista sucks on any Atom processor. Want a good deal check out a Dell Mini9
#19
lawnsprinkler - Posted 3:54 pm PST 01/12/09 (1800 Posts)
#20
jlayman920 - Posted 5:08 pm PST 01/12/09 (254 Posts)
#16 I don't care what your customer base says because I rely on my own personal experience with both operating systems and IMO, XP is better. My wife has a 6 month old laptop running Vista and I have a 4 year old laptop with a crappy Celeron processor running XP. We've had to reboot her comp more in 6 months than I have rebooted mine in 4 years. To me, XP is better.






Wii
Zune
iPod