Welcome to Ben’s Bargains. Please Register, Sign in or Sign in with Facebook

Ben's Bargains Serving Fresh Deals 24/7
Amazon has the new AMD FD6100WMGUSBX FX-6100 Zambezi - Bulldozer 3.3GHz 6MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 95W Six-Core Unlocked Desktop Processor (Retail) for $160 with free shipping. Features an unlocked multiplier, AMD Vision technology, and includes a fan. Circuit City also has it for the same price.
AMD FX-6100 AM3+ Six Core 3.3GHz CPU $160 at Amazon
$160
  • 1
    h5678 - Posted 7:40 am PST 11/28/11 (483 Posts)  Report Spam

    Somebody explain this please. Since there are incredibly few 6-core CPUs, there can't be any s/w optimized for them. Or does the CPU handle that if the s/w simply has some general multicore capacity?

    Reply with quote
    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 2
    Shmeagle - Posted 11:15 am PST 11/28/11 (2456 Posts)  Report Spam

    The software is not optimized for them. At this point Win/7 win 2008 etc. will optimize everything for the software as far as core processing is concerned. Only make sure you are using the 64bit version.

    Reply with quote
    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 3
    NorthSouth - Posted 12:54 pm PST 11/28/11 (2757 Posts)  Report Spam

    That's a gross simplification Shmeagle!
    It is true that the operating system will take advantage of all cores when juggling all the threads from all the running processes. However a single threaded application will not run any better on multiple cores than on a single core (assuming that's all that is running). For decently written software, a single multi-thread-capable process should be able to use whatever cores are available (where it makes sense to do so).
    So in summary:
    1. A process with n threads will have very limited improvement on a system with (n+m) cores. The only improvement might be because there are probably other processes running at the same time.
    2. A well-written multi-thread process will take advantage of whatever cores are available.

    Be careful, or I'll start pontificating about core pinning etc,.

    Reply with quote
    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 4
    BenKat - Posted 2:20 pm PST 11/28/11 (2809 Posts)  Report Spam

    Pontificating. I like that word.

    Reply with quote
    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 5
    Shmeagle - Posted 1:17 pm PST 11/29/11 (2456 Posts)  Report Spam

    Of course it's a gross oversimplification. Do you honestly think that most of the users here will get much more out of their system than stock programs run on Win OS?

    The point here was that an average user will see about as much in a multi-core system as Win OS will allow it. Unless you are going to by-pass the OS multi-threading and develop specifically to the cores itself you are not going to see much more from an 8 core that you will from a 4 core.

    Again some server software such as SQL are written specifically to take advantage, perhaps some games, I don't know.

    Reply with quote
    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0

Already a member? Sign in below.

Forgot Password?
Sign in with Facebook

Registration takes seconds! Once registered you’ll have members only access to:

  • Deal Alert email notifications
  • Giveaways for the hottest products
  • Newsletter for events and holiday promotions
  • Deal comments and discussions
  • The best deal community, ever
or