Circuit City has the new AMD FD6100WMGUSBX FX-6100 Zambezi - Bulldozer 3.3GHz 6MB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache Socket AM3+ 95W Six-Core Unlocked Desktop Processor (Retail) for $180 - $10 off with coupon code OUI47155 [Exp 11/6] = $170 with free shipping. Features an unlocked multiplier, AMD Vision technology, and includes a fan.
Well that review is notably detailed and if on the "up and up" it's very comprehensive. After a lot of time running through it, I may perhaps give in... It's not as I gleaned from the few other FX-6100 reviews, while seems to collaborate what Guru3d reported. Anymore I'm taking away... as with the 8-core they're just as funky and sporadic in performance, and if anything more just a substitute to a 1055T.
There's one thing with this review that appears different... the power; which what they had for loaded power was a good bit less than 1100T, though trails it by 10-12% performance most often. It's not that bad and would still like to see OC FX-6100 vs. OC 1100T. I still want to think a FX-6100 a better OC and a little less power hungry verses the 1100T, but given the 10-12% lead even if at 4.5Ghz the FX-6100 as ground to make up.
It will be a different situation once the FX-6100 dips below $150. Kind of the same thing we saw with the 5850/6850. Sure it was less of a card, but to say what's 5% less performance, today you get it at $130 which a little less than 3 years ago was a $280 part. The 1100T at launch was $265 what 12 months ago, now if you say in several weeks that for 10-12% reduction in performance it's now $150, it will be suitable for the spot.
I like everyone take backward momentum as really abnormal, I might say wait for the next swing of the pendulum, because at least AMD is in the game. No game no clear winners!
Haven't read this, work doesn't like this site, while you'll need to translate from German.
http://ht4u.net/reviews/2011/amd_fx_6100_4100_review/
Still thinking $170 is a little to high though.
Well that review is notably detailed and if on the "up and up" it's very comprehensive. After a lot of time running through it, I may perhaps give in... It's not as I gleaned from the few other FX-6100 reviews, while seems to collaborate what Guru3d reported. Anymore I'm taking away... as with the 8-core they're just as funky and sporadic in performance, and if anything more just a substitute to a 1055T.
There's one thing with this review that appears different... the power; which what they had for loaded power was a good bit less than 1100T, though trails it by 10-12% performance most often. It's not that bad and would still like to see OC FX-6100 vs. OC 1100T. I still want to think a FX-6100 a better OC and a little less power hungry verses the 1100T, but given the 10-12% lead even if at 4.5Ghz the FX-6100 as ground to make up.
It will be a different situation once the FX-6100 dips below $150. Kind of the same thing we saw with the 5850/6850. Sure it was less of a card, but to say what's 5% less performance, today you get it at $130 which a little less than 3 years ago was a $280 part. The 1100T at launch was $265 what 12 months ago, now if you say in several weeks that for 10-12% reduction in performance it's now $150, it will be suitable for the spot.
I like everyone take backward momentum as really abnormal, I might say wait for the next swing of the pendulum, because at least AMD is in the game. No game no clear winners!
The Bulldozers= FAIL. Period. Read!