Samsung Galaxy S 8GB 5" Wi-Fi Android Player $170 at Tiger Direct
- Home
- Merchants
-
Categories
-
Computers
- Laptops
- Desktops
- Monitors
- Internal Drives
- Networking
- Blank Media
- Cables
- Cases / Barebones
- Cooling
- CPUs
- Enclosures
- External Drives
- Flash Storage
- Keyboards
- Memory Modules
- Mice / Input
- Motherboards
- Netbooks
- Optical Drives
- PC Accessories
- Power Supply
- Printers / Scanners
- Servers
- Software
- Sound Cards
- USB Devices
- Video Cards
- Electronics
- Mobile
- Home
- Recreation
- More deals
-
Computers
- Forums
- Popular
- RSS
Is 11ms normal for a monitor this size? I usually see them a lot lower, but I haven't been using 30" monitors...
Very nice monitor, but only for those who absolutely need the pixels ( photographers, designers, ... ).
agree with #2 about the photographers, but besides that,
why in the name of Holy Hell would you spend 800 bucks on this instead of a sharp/panny deals that's been on ben's recently?
expensive
Coupon not working yet.
Next year you should be able to get this on a Black Friday deal for $250-400
good for programmers too. think about how many lines of code you could display at once. and then if you went dual. sweet.
to #1, the dell ultrasharp isn't a typical TN Panel LCD like most other montitors. The lower end TN panels are geared towards consumers, with lower response times but poor color and viewing angles, this monitor is meant for photographers, designers, etc where color rendition is more important than response time.
a 1080p 42" panasonic plasma cost less than this !
I agree with #9. I can get a refurb 47" LCD TV with DVI input and 6ms response time for the same price. I'd rather play WoW on 47" than 30"... Screw photography and design...
#9 and #10 obviously have never worked with a 2560x1600 resolution. i used to work in the video game industry and we used these exact monitors to demo games at E3.
Sweet, you can get a bigger TV with a lower resoliution!? That will look awesome! There is a reason computer monitors and TVs are not always interchangeable.
True and their 3008 30" model is just ridiculous at a price of $2000.
Its like the difference between a gorgeous pair of 34C tits, perky, supple, and round...
...versus....
a massive gross pair of 36DDD tits that sag to the knees w/ pancake big toes and eruptions of pimples and rashes.
Wrong #11, I have this 30" dell at work. Its nice and all but not practical. I'd rather have 2 or 3, 22" monitors
"640×480 pixels ought to be enough for anybody" - anon
#15, i said i used it to demo games at a large scale conference. it was damn good for that purpose. I agree and I would not want a 30" on my desk... my neck would start hurting.
expensive but that resolution makes me drool
If some dweeb uses this for a TV they get what they deserve.
#14, OOOhhhhh now I understand.
Thanks for breaking it down into terms I can understand