EVGA GeForce GTX 670 4GB Video Card $370 at Amazon

8 Comments
155 days ago by TheKenChan in Video Cards
HOTNESS

UNHOT

Amazon has the EVGA 04G-P4-2673-KR GeForce GTX 670 4GB GDDR5 Video Card for $390 - $20 rebate [Exp 12/31] = $370 with free shipping. Check out this review for comparison with other high end cards. Features 1344 CUDA cores.

EVGA GeForce GTX 670 4GB Video Card $370 at Amazon

$370

Comments and Reviews (8)

1

Casecutter - Posted 12:25 pm PST 12/20/12 (5823 Posts) Report Spam
By the PN it's cobnsider a Superclocked w/Backplate and 4GB, so not bad for $370. But as placement of the 6-pin's, indicates it a "Smurf board" hidden by that backing plate. A nice card if the extra memory would help in a 3 monitor Surrond system if not a goal save the $30-40.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/graphics/display/evga-geforce-gtx-670-4gb.html

This has to do with the FTW designation not the Superclock's, but EVGA now has a lower clocked LE version, which I believe is all the right spec's just not the orginal FTW version core clock.
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=176928

Was this useful?

Voting ...

+1 0
2

ontheweb - Posted 1:26 pm PST 12/20/12 (414 Posts) Report Spam
Judging by the Amazon reviews everyone loves this little beast of a card.

Was this useful?

Voting ...

0 0
3

bebimbap - Posted 1:50 pm PST 12/20/12 (86 Posts) Report Spam
I would be all over this deal if i didn't already buy a gigabyte windforce 2gb 670gtx for $350 a few weeks ago.

Was this useful?

Voting ...

0 0
4

Casecutter - Posted 2:33 pm PST 12/20/12 (5823 Posts) Report Spam
#3- I would definitely say the WindForce, unless you like having the rear exhaust the EVGA cards predominately incorporate.
While even Eggview show of some 102 people 86% are 4-5 stars

Was this useful?

Voting ...

0 0
5

bebimbap - Posted 4:10 pm PST 12/20/12 (86 Posts) Report Spam
yes, but 4gb ram vs 2gb....

Was this useful?

Voting ...

0 0
6

zzyzx - Posted 4:51 pm PST 12/20/12 (5149 Posts) Report Spam
Makes a great stocking stuffer for the kids...

Was this useful?

Voting ...

0 0
7

Scooterbug - Posted 9:09 pm PST 12/20/12 (50 Posts) Report Spam
Hell, this will be Christmas dinner for the kids ! I'm watching what they eat.

Was this useful?

Voting ...

0 0
8

Casecutter - Posted 8:25 am PST 12/21/12 (5823 Posts) Report Spam

bebimbap wrote:

yes, but 4gb ram vs 2gb....
Like I said only worth the $30 if thinking triple-monitor and then more often very specific titles. That Xbit review specifically tests the premises, and the come away was "only worth the investment if considering triple-monitor configuration". Sure Skyrim, Metro 2033, or Sniper Elite V2 are games that might like more than 2 GB of graphics memory, but even such a high-end graphics are too laborious in FPS, even with 4 GB at the higher resolution what’s it’s matter? Sure there’s that "I'm future proofing because game in the imminent future might use it". Well, that might a thought, but honestly on the 256-bit it's always going to be a contention if Keplers are providing enough bandwidth. Which might being indicated by the 7970's itn there tests. With almost 40% more Gb/sec throughput and a Gb less memory, the improvement in the games in thier test might show why Metro 2033 or Sniper Elite V2 are faster. IDK

http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Video-Card-Performance-2GB-vs-4GB-Memory-154
http://click.project-kb.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guru3d.com%2Farticle%2Fpalit-geforce-gtx-680-4gb-jetstream-review%2F21&id=1

"4GB frame buffer is also going to be overkill for a 1080p gamer" PCper.
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Galaxy-GeForce-GTX-670-GC-4GB-Graphics-Card-Review/Conclusions-and-Final-Thou

Was this useful?

Voting ...

0 0