Discuss (21) -
Posted at 11:57 AM on Friday 10/9/09 by
Ben
Hotness UNHOT
Dell has the HITACHI Deskstar HD32000 IDK/7K 2TB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive for $160 with free shipping. Has a rotation speed of 7200RPM, 32MB buffer, 8.2ms average seek time, and uses a 5 platter design. [Compare]
  • 1
    enzoferrarifx60 - Posted 12:00 pm PDT 10/9/09 (396 Posts)  Report Spam

    5 platters. no wonder it's cheaper.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 2
    gummy - Posted 12:20 pm PDT 10/9/09 (628 Posts)  Report Spam

    More platters means more heads which should mean more throughput, so I don't mind that. By the same token, it's hard for me to get past the days when people used to refer to these as "death stars".

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 3
    frankburnz - Posted 12:23 pm PDT 10/9/09 (942 Posts)  Report Spam

    All HDD's fail at random times, you get 2 mirror them (Raid 1) and STFU. $160 is dirt cheap insurance policy for 2TB of data loss, time loss, headaches, etc.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 4
    juzdyn - Posted 12:30 pm PDT 10/9/09 (230 Posts)  Report Spam

    this isn't a deal!

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 5
    schmoe90 - Posted 12:35 pm PDT 10/9/09 (1255 Posts)  Report Spam

    So show us something better, #4...

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 6
    frankburnz - Posted 12:40 pm PDT 10/9/09 (942 Posts)  Report Spam

    yeah... we're waiting #4...

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 7
    monkieinabarrel - Posted 12:44 pm PDT 10/9/09 (1016 Posts)  Report Spam

    5 platters huh. Wonder if one of them is redundant? I thought most companies had moved on to 500gb platters

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 8
    superd00d3 - Posted 12:54 pm PDT 10/9/09 (3046 Posts)  Report Spam

    frankburnz wrote:
    All HDD's fail at random times, you get 2 mirror them (Raid 1) and STFU. $160 is dirt cheap insurance policy for 2TB of data loss, time loss, headaches, etc.


    Raid won't protect your data in all cases. All the components in my home machine were fried recently (probably caused by the Antec PSU). IMO the only way to protect data is to back it up onto DVDRs.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 9
    frankburnz - Posted 1:12 pm PDT 10/9/09 (942 Posts)  Report Spam

    oh please... a PSU killing hard drives, "probably"? what is that one in a million, sure it wasn't a power spike, brown out, etc. You have power conditioning? UPS? Backing up 2TB on 450DVD is the most asinine thing I've ever heard of on BB today...

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 10
    Cpotato33 - Posted 1:26 pm PDT 10/9/09 (745 Posts)  Report Spam

    #7 is right, the state of the art is 500GB/platter. More platters means more power. If your HD dock/power supply do not have enough margin, this might not be such a good idea.
    I would rather get a 1.5TG 3 platters drive. Waiting for it to drop in prices. There have been deals for 1.5TB to sell at below $100, so $160 for a 2TB drive is not such a good deal.
    If you are using it as external storage drives, then the rpm number may not matter as much.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 11
    superd00d3 - Posted 1:40 pm PDT 10/9/09 (3046 Posts)  Report Spam

    frankburnz wrote:
    oh please... a PSU killing hard drives, "probably"? what is that one in a million, sure it wasn't a power spike, brown out, etc. You have power conditioning? UPS? Backing up 2TB on 450DVD is the most asinine thing I've ever heard of on BB today...


    I use a surge protector but no power conditioning or UPS. As for backups, IMO you need something external to be safe for the reason I mentioned above. It could even be an external drive which is not always connected to the machine.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 12
    CptFunnypants - Posted 2:52 pm PDT 10/9/09 (45 Posts)  Report Spam

    I backup my 1.5TB drive to floppy every night.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 13
    freakingid10ts - Posted 3:06 pm PDT 10/9/09 (148 Posts)  Report Spam

    3 1/2 or 5 1/4 or maybe even 8 inch?

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 14
    CptFunnypants - Posted 3:07 pm PDT 10/9/09 (45 Posts)  Report Spam

    8" like in War Games. By the way, here is everything you ever wanted to know about this drive:

    http://www.hitachigst.com/tech/techlib.nsf/techdocs/5F2DC3B35EA0311386257634000284AD/$file/7K2000_A7K2000_Spec_r0pdf

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 15
    CptFunnypants - Posted 3:17 pm PDT 10/9/09 (45 Posts)  Report Spam

    Yeah...thats hours of reading. That'll shut this thread up for a while.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 16
    hobubu - Posted 6:39 pm PDT 10/9/09 (68 Posts)  Report Spam

    #12 you need a warehouse too.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 17
    MarcAnthony - Posted 7:43 pm PDT 10/9/09 (144 Posts)  Report Spam

    What do the number of platters offer as a benefit or drawback? Thanks.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 18
    bmndibb2 - Posted 8:53 pm PDT 10/9/09 (809 Posts)  Report Spam

    #17, nothing significant. People just like to sound smart by bringing it up.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 19
    Cpotato33 - Posted 9:42 am PDT 10/10/09 (745 Posts)  Report Spam

    #18, have you checked the power dissipation figures of drives with different platters before you posted your "smart" comment?

    Here is some data from Hitachi site:
    Idle power for 7K1000B (7200rpm, 3 platters): 5.2W
    Idle power for 7K2000 (7200rpm, 5 platters): 7.5W
    Read/write powers are higher, but same difference between 2 drives.
    If your power supply/adaptor is marginal, or if the drive is enclosed in enclosure without good cooling, then it may matter.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 20
    Cpotato33 - Posted 11:11 am PDT 10/10/09 (745 Posts)  Report Spam

    #2, actually more heads/platters do not mean more throughput. Keep in mind that all actuator arms that carry the heads are synchronous such that all heads are positioned at the same track on each surface. So unless you store data in such a way that data from same file are stored in similar tracks on different surface AND the drive software/hardware can support multiple heads read operations you don't get simultaneous reading of data.
    On the other hand, fewer platters for same data amount storage means higher data density per track and thus higher throughput at same rpm.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0

Already a member? Sign in below.

Forgot Password?

Registration takes seconds! Once registered you’ll have members only access to:

  • Favorites bookmark list
  • Fully customizable User Profile
  • Discussions on all products
  • Forums & more
or