Discuss (10) -
Posted at 2:34 AM on Tuesday 05/12/09 by
Ben
Hotness UNHOT
NewEgg.com has the Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 2.66GHz 6MB L2 Cache LGA 775 95W Quad-Core Processor for $220 - $10 code EMCLSMN29 [Exp 5/12] = $210 with free shipping.
  • 1
    npolite - Posted 4:55 am PDT 05/12/09 (236 Posts)  Report Spam

    http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0301968


    $160 at Microcenter

    In store only though

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 2
    dealhunter24 - Posted 5:15 am PDT 05/12/09 (92 Posts)  Report Spam

    #1, great call on the microcenter deal

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 3
    freakingid10ts - Posted 9:16 am PDT 05/12/09 (148 Posts)  Report Spam

    Great in-store price at Micro Center assuming they actually have it in stock (quantities are often bogus) and you have a Micro Center near by for pick up.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 4
    XxESKIMOxX - Posted 9:54 am PDT 05/12/09 (225 Posts)  Report Spam

    frys and microcenter should merge or something ARg.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 5
    fearthefarmers - Posted 10:22 am PDT 05/12/09 (115 Posts)  Report Spam

    This or a E8500?

    E8500: Dual Core, 3.16Ghz, 1333 MHz FSB, 6 MB L2, 65 Watts.

    Q9400: Quad Core, 2.66Ghz, 1333 MHz FSB, 6 MB L2, 95Watts.

    What would be fastest for decoding bluray? Or does the processor speed not matter and the burner is the bottle neck?

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 6
    dave_c - Posted 12:19 pm PDT 05/12/09 (17703 Posts)  Report Spam

    #5, BR decoding only has to happen as fast as the playback FPS so it will not matter.

    If converting to another format, "ripping" discs, it will depend on whether your destination codecs are multi-core optimized. Some are, some aren't.

    Generally speaking the quad Q9400 is the better option, and when paired with a decent mobo w/oc options, plus a good heatsink, you will find they both oc to closer peak speeds than they start out. That should give the Q9400 a lead in BR decoding or at least let it perform similar enough to E8500.

    It seems a rather narrow application though, since either will do realtime decoding for playback and a system can be left sitting doing decoding in the background if you aren't watching, but in the latter case you definitely want quad core so the system has ample cpu cycles left to do other computing, or of course you could set the decoding to lower priority than anything else but if quad core CPUs are available at the budget there is no need for that.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 7
    shaka999 - Posted 1:21 pm PDT 05/12/09 (213 Posts)  Report Spam

    How many games are multi-threaded these days? Just curious how the quad will perform vs a dual ...

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 8
    fearthefarmers - Posted 4:29 pm PDT 05/12/09 (115 Posts)  Report Spam

    Thanks #6.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 9
    some - Posted 2:24 am PDT 05/13/09 (83 Posts)  Report Spam

    tis better for MOST people to have less faster cores than more slower. This is a multi-billion dollar problem with the microprocessor industry that is in the process of getting a solution.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 10
    2133 - Posted 11:50 am PDT 05/13/09 (953 Posts)  Report Spam

    You're better off with a Q6600 if you want to do efficient virtualization. Evil Inside took away hardware virtualization support from these "new" processors. If AMD doesn't step up, Intel will screw people out of more features.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0

Already a member? Sign in below.

Forgot Password?

Registration takes seconds! Once registered you’ll have members only access to:

  • Favorites bookmark list
  • Fully customizable User Profile
  • Discussions on all products
  • Forums & more
or