I live in Philadelphia (zip 19154). CC online reporting "not available for delivery or online". Looks like I'm L on this one. Good luck if your in an area where it is in stock.

Same thing happened to me on Monday/Tuesday when they had the Vizio 50". It was only available at stores 50+ miles from my house (I wanted to buy online and have delivered but it was not available).

Oh boy does polaroid make a bunch of crap. Excuse me. A bunch of crap is made and then polaroid puts their name on it.

it's available in MA with free shipping.
i've seen this in local CC & Target, honestly, picture quality pretty good. go see it yourself.
regarding polaroid crap...yes, they put their name on some cheapo labor made in china baconnaise. but they're ok! i've got some made in china no-name dvd players & couple polaroid, interesting thing is, when i go to set up menu, they're using the same software & all look the same! they're still working fine for me. & u definitely need one of this cheapo player at home, 'coz they just play anything disc u put in, including all copy dvd regardless of media brand...

It's one thing to buy a cheap "Polaroid" DVD player or a pex dispenser but to shell out $900 for a "Polaroid Anything" is foolish.

Ya really. This is hardly a deal even if it had a real name on it. 42" Plasmas are normally under $1000 at this point. You could have gotten a Panasonic for $999, or you can go get a Vizio with much better specs than this and a guaranteed return policy for $999. Wait a couple weeks and the Panasonic will be $999 again. Don't waste money on this garbage.

Basically I compared the polaroid picture with the Olevia another similarly priced off-brand LCD (most of you are familiar with it from this forum) side by side and the Olevia beat the polaroid by a mile using the same signal. Of course the latter was still miles behind the Samsungs with their high contrast ratio but ya got to shell out big bucks for them. I would prefer to have a an LCD TV that is not obsolete in months. I saw an HD-DVD 1080p movie on the Samsung. It was absolutely stunning. When the HD-DVD player was hooked up to the Olevia it was pretty good for the dough but of course it lacked the Samsungs presence. The polaroid looked the worst of the three and all used the HDMI via the player. They just love it when I come into the store and ask them to hook up various scenarious so I can test drive them but it is the only way to get that true sense of bang for the buck. Darn I wish I could afford the Samsung.

Oh ya yes I know I compared a plasma to the LCD. Gosh I like the latest LCD's compared to the plasmas. I think the latter's days are numbered.

Once this 47" Vizio 1080p LCD hits the market for $1650 in like 2 weeks with the costco $250 coupon, it will blow the bottom out of the LCD market and Samsung, Sony, Sharp won't have any choice but to come way down on their overpriced BS in order to compete. This thing is going to burp blow up, its all over deal sites, pages long of people waiting in anticipation for this baby. I predict the Sharp Aquos 52" LCD will be 2799 in about 2 months when Costco's $300 coupon on that kicks in, bringing it to 2499. Then in the middle of 2007 the Vizio 60" 1080p plasma hits the market, and we can all say bye bye to DLP. THATS RIGHT YOU burp, SUCK MY CO0OCK, SUCK IT GOOD YOU burp BITCHES.

#8 WTF is wrong with you?

Hey, #9, jshorr, so why don't you take it upon yourself to tell horndoggy11 that he is being rude and is behaving contrary to the fraternal spirit of this online community?

#9, prepare to be Pwned!

I don't particularly like Horndogs posts but you gotta admit that was some burp funny baconnaise...

Fully a third of the buyers who submitted reviewer comments on the CC site HATE this set.

You can get a 50- to 56-inch Samsung DLP with 1080p now for $1200-$1500. The bigger the screen, the more DLP makes sense. Plasmas in this size range eat electricity like a refrigerator and weigh 100-plus pounds; LCDs aren't there yet on sharpness/contrast/reliability at this size; I'd stack Samsung's DLP picture quality against both.

At a 42-inch range like this, though, I'd consider plasma (barely) first, then LCD, then...nothing at today's specs. And it's just plain gonna be an LCD world as that technology improves.

re: Plasmas vs. LCD's

For those of you suggesting "it will be an LCD world", blah, I remind you of the famous words from Mark Twain:

"Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated".

Go look at the Panasonic THxxPX60U (where xx is inch size in 37, 42, and 50) with optimal settings and compare against any other set. There's no comparsion at that price point, period. Of course, Panasonic ships these with brightness/contrast up full, and retailers also seem to like to display them that way, which is ridiculous.

www.6ave.com is going to have the 42" th42px60u on sale on Saturday for $1149 plus about 150 shipping (plus tax ny and nj only). You can't find any set that can compare on picture quality at that price point.

From plasmatvbuyingguide.com:

"Like earlier Panasonic plasma televisions, the Panasonic TH-42PX60U has excellent black levels, contrast, color reproduction, and aesthetic appeal. There is simply no other 42" plasma television on the market today that can match both its picture quality and its price point in the market. Panasonic was very smart to cut unneeded features from the TH-42PX60U to keep the price low while adding important new features like a second HDMI input and a front-panel composite input. This plasma television is for those HDTV buyers who demand paramount picture quality at a reasonable price."

I'm surprised the negative reviews made it on to the CC site. Many of their items which (obviously) suck only have glowing reviews... I think they'll delete the negative ones.

I do not trust the CC reviews on most items. Got a chuckle out of this one tho.

Horndoggy, do you think I could hook up this plasma TV to a solar cell so I can run it off sunlight, just like I run my landscape lighting off sunlight? You're such an advocate of environmentally-friendly power sources I just know you'll give me some good advice. You know, tell me where I can go?

If you can find enough time to drag yourself away from your harem of concubines, that is.

(grin)

#17, I thought it would have been abundantly obvious from Horndoggys pent up sexual frustration as observed in his post and the amount of time he spends on this site that the boy ain't got laid in a long time.

#9, #18.... THATS RIGHT YOU burp, SUCK MY CO0OCK, SUCK IT GOOD YOU burp BITCHES. (The doggy knows what he wants and how to get it).not to sound repetative...but SUCK MY CO0OCK TOO YOU burp'IN BIOTCHz!!

hmmm.. how come there's no wikipedia listing for horndoggy11?