Discuss (10) -
Posted at 1:16 AM on Tuesday 10/20/09 by
Ben
Hotness UNHOT
eWiz.com has the Samsung F2EG HD154UI 1.5TV Hard Drive for $110 - $15 off coupon code SUPERSTEAL15 [Exp 10/25] = $95 with free shipping. This drive is 5400rpm, with a 32MB cache, 8.9ms average seek time, and 5.52 average latency.
  • 1
    SERSpecv - Posted 1:21 am PDT 10/20/09 (50 Posts)  Report Spam

    I've had it with Seagate drives, so i bought a western digital. Anyone have experiences with Samsung drives?

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 2
    Towncivilian - Posted 3:35 am PDT 10/20/09 (1236 Posts)  Report Spam

    1.5TV, Ben?

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 3
    bunga28 - Posted 3:42 am PDT 10/20/09 (157 Posts)  Report Spam

    best ones I've ever had (that being said, HDD's tend to not working; it does not matter what company is making them). I have 6 1.5tb samsungs and 4 1.5tb seagates. They all work great; though the samsungs are cooler than seagates, of course.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 4
    Poman - Posted 5:41 am PDT 10/20/09 (133 Posts)  Report Spam

    hmm, tried the code on another Samsung drive, the HE103UJ, and no go... bummer.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 5
    Wayno - Posted 6:08 am PDT 10/20/09 (601 Posts)  Report Spam

    #2: Tera-volts! Smile

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 6
    sguy2130 - Posted 9:20 am PDT 10/20/09 (1031 Posts)  Report Spam

    This might not be a bad deal if it operated at typical standard hard drive voltage, but considering that you will have to buy a step up transformer to get all the way to 1.5 Tera-volts you will face an astronomical cost just to use this.

    No deal. Total scam.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 7
    Cpotato33 - Posted 5:03 pm PDT 10/20/09 (745 Posts)  Report Spam

    Too bad this one is 5400rpm, I need one to be put inside my pc. For external use, this one is fine.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 8
    dave_c - Posted 7:41 pm PDT 10/20/09 (16755 Posts)  Report Spam

    500GB/platter 5400RPM drives are just as fast for desktop use and last gen 7200RPM drives #7, you'd do well to ignore what you think you know and just go by benchmarks as always if that last 10% difference really matters in your use.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 9
    Cpotato33 - Posted 5:56 am PDT 10/21/09 (745 Posts)  Report Spam

    dave_c wrote:
    500GB/platter 5400RPM drives are just as fast for desktop use and last gen 7200RPM drives #7, you'd do well to ignore what you think you know and just go by benchmarks as always if that last 10% difference really matters in your use.


    Not really, data density is only one factor, there is also the seek time which favors the higher rpm substantially. Also, I was comparing to 500GB/platter 7200 rpm drive too, of course.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 10
    dave_c - Posted 5:34 pm PDT 10/22/09 (16755 Posts)  Report Spam

    Cpotato33 wrote:
    dave_c wrote:
    500GB/platter 5400RPM drives are just as fast for desktop use and last gen 7200RPM drives #7, you'd do well to ignore what you think you know and just go by benchmarks as always if that last 10% difference really matters in your use.


    Not really, data density is only one factor, there is also the seek time which favors the higher rpm substantially. Also, I was comparing to 500GB/platter 7200 rpm drive too, of course.


    Yes, really. Even if loading an application causes 1000 I/Os, there is only a roughly 1ms difference between the two RPMs, that's 1 second total. The higher read and write speed from the higher density platter is more than a 1 second difference with that many I/Os. However, I am talking about the average performance across all last generation versus current generation drives, as always there are best of class and worst of class products.

    There are certain applications that are quite latency sensitive, small delivered data sets like a database or webserver, but not on the typical desktop system including running the OS.

    If you were comparing 500GB/platter 7K2 RPM then you are correct but note above I specifically wrote last-generation, there were no last generation 500GB/platter drives.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0

Already a member? Sign in below.

Forgot Password?

Registration takes seconds! Once registered you’ll have members only access to:

  • Favorites bookmark list
  • Fully customizable User Profile
  • Discussions on all products
  • Forums & more
or