Discuss (9) -
Posted at 11:28 AM on Tuesday 08/4/09 by
Ben
Hotness UNHOT
Dell has the Sharp Aquos LC46E77U 46" 1080p 120Hz LCD HDTV for $1049 with free shipping. [Compare]

  • Full HD 1920 x 1080, 450 cd/m2 brightness, 4 ms response time
  • 120Hz Fine Motion, 176-degree H/V viewing angles, 5x HDMI inputs
    • 1
      qtn2x - Posted 12:49 pm PDT 08/4/09 (396 Posts)  Report Spam

      120hz, pretty decent deal.

      Was this useful?
      Voting ...
      0 0
    • 2
      machrob - Posted 1:41 pm PDT 08/4/09 (270 Posts)  Report Spam

      i'll take 60hz at 52" for less money.. come one!

      Was this useful?
      Voting ...
      0 0
    • 3
      equipojesus - Posted 2:30 pm PDT 08/4/09 (95 Posts)  Report Spam

      120hz is a marketing gimmick right?

      Was this useful?
      Voting ...
      0 0
    • 4
      hausman - Posted 2:51 pm PDT 08/4/09 (531 Posts)  Report Spam

      I can tell the difference if they're side by side.

      Was this useful?
      Voting ...
      0 0
    • 5
      h0j0626 - Posted 4:32 pm PDT 08/4/09 (51 Posts)  Report Spam

      @4 I agree also. After comparing them side by side I would prefer the 120hz.

      Was this useful?
      Voting ...
      0 0
    • 6
      aliasfox - Posted 5:33 pm PDT 08/4/09 (176 Posts)  Report Spam

      240 Hz is a marketing gimmick, 120 Hz isn't.

      The principle reason is that there's a difference in frame rates between video (30 fps) and film (24fps) sources. Standard TVs are 60 Hz, which 30 divides evenly into, but 24 does not. What this means is that a video source merely has to display each frame twice, whereas a film source has to display every third frame three times to match the cadence (other frames are displayed twice). 120 Hz divides evenly into both 30 and 24, so it solves that issue and makes film based motion less jittery.

      On an interlaced source, 120 Hz can appear to be smoother, but not entirely convinced that's the case on a progressive source - 60 fps progressive should be more than fast enough for smooth motion.

      Lastly, most manufacturers include some kind of "ClearView" processing on their 120 Hz and up televisions that interpolates and processes frames instead of simply repeating them - makes a lot of sources look really weird - I'm not a fan of it.

      Was this useful?
      Voting ...
      0 0
    • 7
      zippy2 - Posted 11:51 pm PDT 08/4/09 (254 Posts)  Report Spam

      I got the 46" 60 Hz and I love it. It had a better review than the 120 on cnet.

      Was this useful?
      Voting ...
      0 0
    • 8
      rekonize - Posted 1:46 am PDT 08/5/09 (34 Posts)  Report Spam

      Honestly the manufacturer of the unit has exponentially more impact on the quality of the picture than refresh rate. But this subject comes down to preference. If you watch a lot of documentaries and sports, 120hz capability usually has a positive impact on the viewing experience. However, during cinematic sequences during movies, sitcoms, dramas, etc., 120hz will affect the picture in a manner that wasn't intended during filming, making them seem more "lifelike". Obviously on a 120hz set you can switch back and forth, but if you don't watch many live-action programs then it may not be worth it.

      Sharp's picture quality has been on par with Sony and Samsung in the large LCD market. This is a relatively good deal.

      Was this useful?
      Voting ...
      0 0
    • 9
      h0j0626 - Posted 5:23 pm PDT 08/7/09 (51 Posts)  Report Spam

      @8 you are so right. I love the "life-like" images that 120hz offers.

      Was this useful?
      Voting ...
      0 0

    Already a member? Sign in below.

    Forgot Password?

    Registration takes seconds! Once registered you’ll have members only access to:

    • Favorites bookmark list
    • Fully customizable User Profile
    • Discussions on all products
    • Forums & more
    or