Discuss (32) -
Posted at 1:57 PM on Saturday 11/8/08 by
Ben
Hotness UNHOT
6ave.com has the Shure SE210-K Sound-Isolating Earphones for $150 - 30% off with coupon code AFLSHURE = $105 with free shipping. The Hi-definition MicroSpeaker is a single balanced armature drive which delivers full range audio. [BizRate]
  • 1
    mdheinzer - Posted 2:15 pm PST 11/8/08 (630 Posts)  Report Spam

    are these really better than say skullcandy for $20? i mean 105 for earbuds? they would have to be unbelievable.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 2
    kkndkknd2 - Posted 2:29 pm PST 11/8/08 (28 Posts)  Report Spam

    good deal.. thx

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 3
    EchoTony - Posted 2:31 pm PST 11/8/08 (478 Posts)  Report Spam

    Same question as #1. I know Shure is a quality company, but this is pricey.
    Is isolation superior to noise canceling over the ear type?

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 4
    NeuB - Posted 2:37 pm PST 11/8/08 (113 Posts)  Report Spam

    No WAY could these be worth $150 before the discount, what could they possibly do? How much of an audiophile could you possibly be. It seems ridiculous to buy these, the same goes for the $1000+ over the ear things.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 5
    wrong0 - Posted 3:22 pm PST 11/8/08 (429 Posts)  Report Spam

    Unless you don't mind paying a price premium (mostly all for the brand name), I would rather suggest Sennheiser CX300's. I tried Shure E2C's a few years back, and they sound similar if not exactly the same.

    Basically, the point is, when you're using earbuds -- you're probably going to be using a portable media/mp3 player/laptop/phone, which all have audio output sound quality nowhere near that of a recording studio (or even a good home audio setup), where quality monitoring headphones are essential.

    $40 at Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-CX300-B-Earbuds-Black/dp/B000E6G9RI

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 6
    binaryvisions - Posted 3:46 pm PST 11/8/08 (1049 Posts)  Report Spam

    These are absolutely excellent earbuds. You do not have to have recording studio quality to appreciate them.

    I listened to half a dozen different sets of buds and these blew them all away - at this price point, I don't think you can do any better. There are better buds at higher prices, but these are a good mid range.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 7
    poorstudent - Posted 4:03 pm PST 11/8/08 (82 Posts)  Report Spam

    These are pretty pricey...
    unless you listen to music that are very high quality, I would advise you to just buy cheaper ear buds, like sony or JVC.
    A 50-60 price can get you a pretty decent one.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 8
    noneyet99 - Posted 4:08 pm PST 11/8/08 (157 Posts)  Report Spam

    as for isolation vs. noice cancelling:

    I've used both good noise canceling (the BOSE that everyone drools over, plus good Sennheiser sound isolating, and to me they both give you about the same "reduction" (as measured by plane trips with them).

    The difference is, the isolating just isolates. The canceling leaves you with and annoying high-frequency hum or buzz, even the really expensive ones. And I'm 40, not 8 yrs old, so my ears aren't THAT pristine.

    I'd go with the in-ear isolating over any of the current cancellation types. Even the $40 Sennheiser trump the $350? BOSE (not sure of current prices).

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 9
    Necromas - Posted 5:08 pm PST 11/8/08 (352 Posts)  Report Spam

    ... mid range?

    I agree with everything else you said, but mid range? I think your standards are a little off from the norm.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 10
    TTM77 - Posted 5:42 pm PST 11/8/08 (987 Posts)  Report Spam

    I have the $2,000 one. It works great. I put it on and it not just isolate the wife's voice, she was gone. It even bring me beer. LOL

    The $10 work just as good.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 11
    fubaconat55 - Posted 7:51 pm PST 11/8/08 (251 Posts)  Report Spam

    I would not pay over 50 for earbuds. this is silly.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 12
    kidrobobot - Posted 8:03 pm PST 11/8/08 (50 Posts)  Report Spam

    I tried this once. It was just slightly better than the 110. Not really worth its price to me.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 13
    thrashertm - Posted 8:07 pm PST 11/8/08 (15 Posts)  Report Spam

    I have both the Sennheiser CX300 and the Shure E2C. I prefer the Cx300 - much richer base, and I got them for $10 from Newegg Smile

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 14
    vonZipper - Posted 8:14 pm PST 11/8/08 (108 Posts)  Report Spam

    +1 for the Senn 300s
    Most of the time, I end up ripping them out of my hears when I snag the cord on something. I can tolerate a $30 set loss in that manner, but will break my heart if a $150 set got toasted like that.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 15
    bunnie - Posted 8:15 pm PST 11/8/08 (342 Posts)  Report Spam

    I paid over a $100 for Shure earbuds. They were more annoying to wear than the Sennheiser CX300 that have gone from $80 to $50 to $30 and now I see to $10.

    Shure is the word "overpriced" translated into a manufacturer's name.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 16
    Pdok - Posted 8:29 pm PST 11/8/08 (744 Posts)  Report Spam

    The problem with these types of "earbuds" is that they're trying to do the job of much more expensive in-ear monitors, and they generally don't do it well.

    I've used the cheaper Shures, and the slightly more expensive Westone (who used to make the Shures.) The $75 Westones are made much better than these. I've RMA'd my Shures twice for one of the earpieces dying. The Westones are a little more durable.

    The $450 Westones IEM's are fantastic for what they do, which is kill off the 3000-plus Watts of soundstage noise so you can hear the mix you want at an appropriate volume. They're maybe not the best choice for jogging around with your iPod...

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 17
    craigkes - Posted 8:53 pm PST 11/8/08 (233 Posts)  Report Spam

    Yeah, 105 is a lot of bones to some headphones. Plus, I am so tough on mine it really wouldn't be worth it I don't think.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 18
    h0m3l3s5 - Posted 9:06 pm PST 11/8/08 (51 Posts)  Report Spam

    If you can afford it, why not?

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 19
    intense321 - Posted 9:19 pm PST 11/8/08 (188 Posts)  Report Spam

    I've owned every earbud out there, including these. They are just "ok". I paid $250 for mine and they weren't worth that. They *might* be worth $105. I now use the Sennheiser IE8. Look 'em up. Can't get 'em cheaper than $450. Worth every penny.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0
  • 20
    hoffi - Posted 1:26 am PST 11/9/08 (301 Posts)  Report Spam

    Have the Shure E2C's, excellent sound quality, noise isolation better than BOSE noise cancellation in my opinion when it comes to plane trips. I only use them with my ipod, so I can't comment on professional use.

    Was this useful?
    Voting ...
    0 0

Already a member? Sign in below.

Forgot Password?

Registration takes seconds! Once registered you’ll have members only access to:

  • Favorites bookmark list
  • Fully customizable User Profile
  • Discussions on all products
  • Forums & more
or