| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
#0 Ben
Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 41085
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:51 am Post subject: XFX PVT96OZDFU GeForce 9600 1GB PCI-E Bundle $60 at Newegg |
|
|
Newegg has the XFX PVT96OZDFU GeForce 9600 GSO 1GB 128-bit GDDR2 PCI Express x16 2.0 HDCP-Ready SLI-Supported Video Card bundled with Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Call of Duty: World at War for $80 - $20 rebate [Exp 6/30] = $60 with free shipping. Includes a lifetime manufacturer warranty for parts and labor.
Click Here
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sponsor
|
|
 |
#1 Casecutter
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 2612
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#2 Nobahar
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:10 am Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
#1, I don't understand, benchmark-wise it doesn't mop the floor with this card.
That and you can pay 5 bucks more for a OC'd 9600GT (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127418) which is GDDR3 and outperforms the Radeon.
Graphics card prices are dropping across the market, and will more when the DX11 cards are released. These deals aren't that special considering your 200 dollar cards will be half that if you wait a few more months. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#3 benzachink
Joined: 25 Jun 2009 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:26 am Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
| Will this work well for my surfing and word processing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#4 DeathBat
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 493
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:48 am Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
| #1 is a big fat butt fuck with lots of time on his little hands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#5 bmndibb2

Joined: 04 Apr 2009 Posts: 454
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:48 pm Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
| Will this run Solitaire at 60 FPS? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#6 CompWiz17

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 4521
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:09 pm Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
#2: yes, the Radeon 4670 does mop the floor with this card. You're looking at a review of the wrong card.
You could make an entire graphics card lineup just from all the different cards that nVidia has sold under this same 9600GSO name.
On the high end, you'd take the 9600GSO's sold by galaxy early on which actually had 512mb of RAM onobard, and unlock them to being the same as the 8800GTS. (you can flash them with the 8800GTS bios to unlock the extra shaders, RAM, and memory bus)
Then, you'd have the traditional 9600GSO 768mb card, followed by the 384mb version.
Next down the line you could use the 9600GSO with only 48 shaders, less than half of the amount of the original 9600GSO.
Then, finally, you'd have this card. It has the 96 shaders of the 384/768mb 960GSO's, yet a slower 128 bit memory interface. To top it off it uses the ancient GDDR2 RAM. GDDR2 is a 5 year old memory standard that is pre-DDR2, essentially DDR1 with some tweaks. Since memory bandwidth is a function of bus width times memory speed, this card is horrendously slow.
Putting 1gb of slow old RAM onto a card with a 128 bit memory interface is completely useless, this offers absolutely no benefit over even 256mb of RAM. If you were to use game settings that utilize a good portion of the 1gb available, the extremely slow memory bandwidth would push your framerates down to the seconds per frame range. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#7 CompWiz17

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 4521
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:11 pm Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
Why does nVidia keep putting out new cards with the same name? How can you like a company which uses such a blatant bait-and-switch strategy to fool consumers into buying slow, expensive cards?
Remember the old 8800GTS? And more recently the GTX 260? One name, multiple cards.
Of course, they also like running the same card with multiple names. The 8800GS has been renamed 4 times now, appearing in the 8xxx. 9xxx, 1xx and 2xx generations.
Plus, they're trying to pawn this off at $60? Just a few days ago ZipZoomFly had the Radeon 4850 on sale for $55, cheaper than this card. That card is at least double the speed of this card. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#8 CompWiz17

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 4521
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:22 pm Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
#2: also, why would you spend $65 on a 9600GT? Those cards are noticably slower than the venrable 8800GT's. And, the 4830's, which are slightly faster than the 8800GT's, have been on sale many times in the $60-70 range. At $65 the 9600GT's are not a good deal, when Radeon 4830's, the good 9600GSO's(the ones with 768mb RAM), and the Radeon 3870's all are going on sale for less money.
The only price they'd really be a good buy at is the $30-40 range, and nVidia can't really make a profit on them in that price range.
Just a few days ago I bought a Radeon 4850 on ZipZoomFly for $55. That card is another quite noticable performance step up from the 8800GT/4830's, and at $55 it's really the best performance for the money of any card on the market. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#9 S_Klass
Joined: 02 Nov 2007 Posts: 1088
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:54 pm Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
| CW - Telling it like it is since 2007! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#10 jamex

Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 767 Location: Your Mom's house
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:37 pm Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
| CompWiz FTW |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#11 benzachink
Joined: 25 Jun 2009 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:26 pm Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
HI cw, I NEED TO have several windows open while surfing and reading pdf files, will this do the job for me?
Thanks for your really detailed resposes! I think if takes two posts to ansers, it's better answers, yes? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#12 CheezWhiz17

Joined: 24 Feb 2009 Posts: 163 Location: ATI sucks / NVIDIA RULES
|
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:38 am Post subject: Re: Website Comment |
|
|
| CompWiz17 wrote: | #2: also, why would you spend $65 on a 9600GT? Those cards are noticably slower than the venrable 8800GT's. And, the 4830's, which are slightly faster than the 8800GT's, have been on sale many times in the $60-70 range. At $65 the 9600GT's are not a good deal, when Radeon 4830's, the good 9600GSO's(the ones with 768mb RAM), and the Radeon 3870's all are going on sale for less money.
The only price they'd really be a good buy at is the $30-40 range, and nVidia can't really make a profit on them in that price range.
Just a few days ago I bought a Radeon 4850 on ZipZoomFly for $55. That card is another quite noticable performance step up from the 8800GT/4830's, and at $55 it's really the best performance for the money of any card on the market. |
You would spend $65 on it because NVIDIA HAS DRIVERS THAT ACTUALLY WORK!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#13 Oio

Joined: 04 Oct 2007 Posts: 1361
|
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:13 am Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
| foo! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
#14 Stormer87
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:17 am Post subject: Website Comment |
|
|
| no, you need at least a gtx280 to open a pdf. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|